AMD Instinct MI350P
Fields
accelerators/amd-instinct-mi350pNotes
AUDIT 2026-10-03 (AMD convention re-verified against the MI350P page; no values changed): the MI350P page uses the identical labelling scheme as the MI350X - 'Peak X Performance' DENSE, 'Peak X Performance with Structured Sparsity' SPARSE at 2x - so every dense flag here is correct. Same micro-scaling caveat as the MI350X: the MXFP4 and MXFP6 rows print 4.6 PFLOPs with NO sparsity variant and are therefore dense, not sparse-and-not-to-be-halved. This page also prints the vector-vs-matrix split explicitly ('Peak Half Precision (FP16) Performance 72 TFLOPs' against 'Peak Half Precision Matrix (FP16) Performance 1.15 PFLOPs'), and the record's two fp16 rows are those two different paths - 72.0 vector and 1150 matrix - now annotated so they cannot be read as a contradiction. THE POINT OF THIS PART for inference: it is the only CDNA4 part with a 4096-bit interface and a PCIe add-in-card form factor ('PCIe Add-in Card', 'Dimensions Full Height / Double Slot', 600W TBP configurable to 450W), i.e. it is the air-cooled, rack-optional MI350 member. Its 4 TB/s and 144 GB are exactly half the MI350X's 8 TB/s and 288 GB, and its dense matrix throughput is exactly half too - but it needs no OAM baseboard, which is often the binding constraint. The CDNA4 part you can actually buy as a normal add-in card, and the only CDNA4 SKU without an OAM/8-GPU-platform story. Exactly HALF of an OAM part in every dimension: 128 CUs vs 256, 8192 SPs vs 16,384, 512 matrix cores vs 1024, 73B transistors vs 185B, 144 GB vs 288 GB, 4096-bit vs 8192-bit, 4 TB/s vs 8 TB/s, 128 MB Infinity Cache vs 256 MB.
Note the page does NOT state a release year for MI350P (no 'Launch Date' field), so release_year 2025 is inferred from it shipping alongside the June 2025 MI350 series - treat it as approximate.
Power is the interesting part: 600W max TBP but 450W TBP is configurable, and the card uses a standard 12V-2x6 connector rather than a 54V UBB. That makes it deployable in ordinary air-cooled servers. Passive cooling, full height / 267mm / double slot, Linux x86_64 only.
No Infinity Fabric links are listed on the spec page - scale-up beyond the card is PCIe only. That is a real limitation for multi-GPU inference: the OAM parts get a 153 GB/s scale-up mesh, this card gets PCIe Gen5 x16 (128 GB/s bidirectional) per card.
CDNA4 software surface is confirmed on the product page: OpenMP, OpenCL, HIP, ROCm, TensorFlow, PyTorch, ONNX-RT, SGLang, JAX, Triton, Kokkos, RAJA. That is the broadest explicitly-listed framework support of any part here and worth noting for inference engine selection.
TF32 is software-emulated on CDNA4. Sparse figures are 2x dense. Two fp16 entries on purpose: 72 TFLOPS vector, 1150 TFLOPS matrix. MXFP6/MXFP4 at 4600 PFLOPs. ROCm LLVM target gfx950. FP64 (AUDIT 2026-10-04, row added): 36.0 TFLOPs, vector and matrix both, dense. Recorded on the sibling nvidia-b200 comparison as AMD's 2x-B200 HPC pitch: AMD's chart plots MI350X FP64 72.1 vs B200 SXM 5's 37.
ON-CHIP CACHE ROW ADDED 2026-10-05 (schema authority pass, agent w5-schema) - corrected to 2026-10-05 below. `onchip_cache` is new in schemas/accelerator.schema.json. This figure was already stated in these notes and was unqueryable; the schema field exists so it can be filtered and compared instead of grepped. The value was verified against the first-party source named in `source_note`, and the trap that source contains is recorded there too. NO new number was introduced: every value below was already present in this record's own prose.