arXiv API recheck: papers mentioning llama.cpp (70 results, all third-party uses)

Re-run of the negative search behind gotcha meta-llama-cpp-has-no-paper-do-not-invent-one, on 2026-10-04, to confirm that existing gotcha still holds rather than assume it. opensearch:totalResults is now 70, up from the 5 recorded when the gotcha was written, so the population of papers that MENTION llama.cpp has grown substantially - which makes the negative MORE important, not less. Inspected entries confirm none of them is a llama.cpp system paper: 2601.14277 is a quantization evaluation OF llama.cpp on Llama-3.1-8B-Instruct; 2406.10816 is an Armv9 inference-optimization study; 2511.05502 is a comparative Apple Silicon serving study of MLX/MLC-LLM/Ollama/llama.cpp; 2603.23996 is a forensic artifact analysis of Ollama/LM Studio/llama.cpp; 2608.09225 is BaseRT, an Apple-silicon inference system that lists llama.cpp as a baseline. Every one is a third party USING or ATTACKING the project. The existing gotcha's conclusion is unchanged and its evidence is now stronger; this source records the recheck so the negative has a dated second reading rather than a single unreplicated check.