MetaX C550 OAM GPGPU product page (MetaX's own English site) - features published, NO compute figure published

VERBATIM 2026-10-04 via web_extract. Recorded because accelerators/metax-c550 cites this page already but carries NO flops rows at all; this record establishes what the page does and does not publish, which is the evidence for that empty flops array being correct rather than unfinished. INTRODUCTION, verbatim: 'MetaX C550 is a flagship OAM module general-purpose GPU (GPGPU), engineered on MetaX's proprietary core GPU IP and compliant with OAM 1.5/2.0 standards. It delivers powerful multi-precision computing power, large-capacity high-bandwidth memory, and an 896 GB/s 8-GPU full-interconnect bandwidth. Supported by with the MXMACA software stack compatible with mainstream GPU ecosystems, it is ideally suited for intelligent computing, general-purpose computing, and data processing.' PRODUCT FEATURES, verbatim (the complete published feature list, four bullets): 'Single module equipped with 64GB GPU Memory, featuring end-to-end ECC protection' 'MetaXLink interconnect enables an 8-card full-interconnect topology with bandwidth up to 896 GB/s' 'Supports virtualization with software-defined partitioning at a granularity as fine as 1%' 'OAM 1.5/2.0 compliant form factor module with a Maximum Board Power of 450W' NEGATIVE FINDING - NO COMPUTE FIGURE PUBLISHED: there is NO TFLOPS, NO TOPS, NO precision table, and no peak-compute row anywhere on this page. The phrase 'powerful multi-precision computing power' is marketing prose with no number attached to it. A full regex sweep of the extracted page text found no numeric throughput figure of any kind. So the flops array on accelerators/metax-c550 being empty is CORRECT and is not a research gap. SPARSITY/DENSE CONVENTION: nothing to state, because no compute figure exists to carry a convention. MetaX publishes no sparsity footnote on this page and no row titled 'with Structured Sparsity'. FIGURES THE PAGE DOES PUBLISH, FOR THE RECORD: 64 GB GPU memory (consistent with the stored vram_gb 64 and memory_type hbm2e, though the page says only 'GPU Memory' and does NOT name a memory technology or a bandwidth - the stored metax-c550 record has memory_bandwidth_gbps null, which is correct); Maximum Board Power 450W (consistent with the stored tdp_w 450); OAM 1.5/2.0 form factor (consistent with the stored form_factors ['oam']). SIBLING PAGES READ THE SAME PASS, for the same negative result and to rule out a spec table living on a neighbouring URL: MetaX C500 (https://www.metax-tech.com/en/goods/prod.html?cid=107&id=21) publishes 'Single card equipped with 64GB GPU Memory, featuring end-to-end ECC protection', 'MetaXLink interconnect technology supports high-speed 2-way or 4-way card-to-card interconnection', 'Supports virtualization with software-defined partitioning at a granularity as fine as 1%', 'Full-height, full-length, dual-slot PCIe card with a Maximum Board Power of 350W' - again NO compute figure and NO memory bandwidth. MetaX C500X (cid=107&id=36) publishes 'MetaXLink optical interconnect interface supporting scale-up topologies from 16 to 64 cards' and 'Maximum Board Power of 350W' - again no compute figure. MetaX N100 (cid=106&id=34) publishes 'Equipped with 16GB GPU Memory' and 'Maximum Board Power of 70W' - again no compute figure. CONSEQUENCE FOR accelerators/metax-c500-n100: that record's flops rows are all basis secondary-aggregator from en.wikipedia.org. This pass confirms that MetaX's OWN site publishes no compute figure for the C500, C500X, C550 or N100, so the aggregator basis is not a fixable omission - it is the best available state, and the correct fix is a note saying so, not a better citation. Its stored vram_gb 64 / tdp_w 450 for the C550 side match the C550 page; the C500 page independently gives 64 GB and 350 W, so a combined C500/C550 record should state which part each field describes.