UNREACHABLE (SECOND, INDEPENDENT VENDOR DOMAIN): Enflame's hardware documentation centre on support.enflame-tech.com is behind the same Tencent Cloud WAF as the main site, so the vendor's most detailed interconnect material is doubly inaccessible

TESTED 2026-10-05, extending data/sources/w5a-enflame-s60-vendor-site-unreachable-waf-confirmed which had established that www.enflame-tech.com/product-technologies/s60 is blocked. The vendor's documentation centre is a DIFFERENT hostname - support.enflame-tech.com, discovered via search rather than guessed - and it was worth testing separately precisely because a subdomain can have different WAF configuration. It does not. Both URLs below returned an identical 403 interstitial body of 837 characters: https://support.enflame-tech.com/onlinedoc_hw/5-s6x/S60/index.html https://support.enflame-tech.com/onlinedoc_hw/5-s6x/index.html The body verbatim: 'img 403 / 您的请求已中断 / 您提交的请求可能对网站造成威胁，无法访问 / 可能原因 / Web应用防护服务检测您当前访问存在Web安全风险或访问不合规' with '腾讯云WAF / 访问拦截' and a per-request UUID (c41ee021397ef17e20235a33f6fa7862-f14e77c98299493bdfbfe601b55d1b0d843eaf and 5cb94611e238d2feb01ca55a36d1998a-d835b10389ebcfe601b55d1b0d843eaf). Distinct request UUIDs per fetch confirm this is a per-request WAF verdict, not a cached error. WHY A SECOND BLOCKED HOST IS A NEW FACT RATHER THAN A REPEAT. The earlier source proved the marketing site is unreachable. This proves the documentation centre - which is where an interconnect spec would live if one existed, since S60 is a multi-card training part and its doc centre is titled '燧原S60推理' / '燧原S60 — 燧原硬件文档中心' - is also unreachable. Search engines index this path, so content there is not necessarily absent, only unreadable from here. That is the difference between 'Enflame publishes no fabric bandwidth' (unprovable from here) and 'Enflame's fabric documentation cannot be read from here', and only the second is supportable. CONSEQUENCE FOR THE INVENTORY: interconnect/enflame-s60-fabric is filed as a verified negative about FIRST-PARTY ACCESS, and its bandwidth is null with a basis that says so. It is explicitly NOT filed as a claim that the S60 has no scale-up fabric. An aggregator (mirrorfrog.com/en/docs/cards/others/enflame-s60/) does carry an S60 entry and the TechInsights teardown (cn-enflame-techinsights) establishes the die, but neither yields a fabric bandwidth, and the one authoritative independent source paywalls its quantitative content.