inference/research
verifiedhigh · 0.95updated 2026-10-03

MI355X, MLPerf Inference v6.0 Offline: Llama 2 70B WMXFP4 on 8xMI355X, aggregate output throughput

103480 output tokens/s (aggregate, MLPerf 'Tokens per second')

Fields

id
benchmarks/mi355x-mlperf-v6-0-llama2-70b-wmxfp4-offline-tokens
Metric
tps_aggregate
Value
103,480
Unit
output tokens/s (aggregate, MLPerf 'Tokens per second')
Model
Llama 2 70B (WMXFP4 weights, FP8 KV cache, UINT8 scales)
Methodology
AGGREGATE, offline batch scenario: MLPerf Offline processes all samples in one batch, no concurrency ceiling and no latency constraint (the TTFT<=2s / TPOT<=200ms values in the log are inherited harness defaults and are not binding in Offline). Samples per second 365.738. Hardware: 8x AMD Instinct MI355X, 288GB HBM3E each, XGMI accelerator interconnect, PCIe Gen5 x16 host link, 8x EPYC 9575F host, 3.0TB host memory. TP=8 implied by the 8-GPU node and the submission's single-node 8-GPU configuration. Software stack, verbatim from the MLCommons system JSON: PyTorch 2.9.1+git8907517, ROCm 7.0.0, vllm-11b6af52, aiter-6af8b687, hipblaslt-1.0.0.70000-38~22.04, Ubuntu 22.04.5 LTS. Harness parameters: min_duration 3600000 ms, min_query_count 24576 accuracy samples, samples_per_query 1465200, accuracy target 99.9. OMITTED BY SOURCE: actual input and output sequence lengths are fixed by the MLPerf Llama2-70B reference implementation rather than published in the log; max_num_seqs, max_num_batched_tokens, and QuickReduce layer-drop configuration are not in the summary log (the AMD repro guide shows the same commands, which is what makes this reproducible).
Measured by
vendor
Reproducible
yes
notes
PRIMARY AUDITED NUMBER: this is a verbatim MLCommons harness log from an audited MLPerf v6.0 closed-division submission, not a marketing figure. AMD's repro guide (bench-amd-mlperf-v6-0-repro-guide) prints essentially identical sample/token-per-second figures from a re-run, which is unusually strong evidence of reproducibility. Scale note: 103480 tok/s on ONE 8-GPU node. AMD's multi-node 87-GPU (11-node) Llama 2 70B Server run reached 1016375 tok/s and the Offline run 1.04211e+06 tok/s - see mi355x-mlperf-v6-0-llama2-70b-87gpu-offline-tokens. That is roughly 10x, i.e. ~93-98% scaling efficiency, and is AMD's first MLPerf entry above 1M tok/s. Caveat: this is a 99.9%-accuracy quantized model (WMXFP4), so it is not comparable to FP8 or FP16 figures in this repo without accounting for quantization.

Notes

PRIMARY AUDITED NUMBER: this is a verbatim MLCommons harness log from an audited MLPerf v6.0 closed-division submission, not a marketing figure. AMD's repro guide (bench-amd-mlperf-v6-0-repro-guide) prints essentially identical sample/token-per-second figures from a re-run, which is unusually strong evidence of reproducibility. Scale note: 103480 tok/s on ONE 8-GPU node. AMD's multi-node 87-GPU (11-node) Llama 2 70B Server run reached 1016375 tok/s and the Offline run 1.04211e+06 tok/s - see mi355x-mlperf-v6-0-llama2-70b-87gpu-offline-tokens. That is roughly 10x, i.e. ~93-98% scaling efficiency, and is AMD's first MLPerf entry above 1M tok/s. Caveat: this is a 99.9%-accuracy quantized model (WMXFP4), so it is not comparable to FP8 or FP16 figures in this repo without accounting for quantization.

Cross-references