inference/research
verifiedhigh · 0.85updated 2026-10-05

LBNL 2014 US PUE by space type - room: 2.5 (component sum: 1 | 0.05 | 0.2 | 1.23 | 0.02 -> IT 1, transformer 0.05, UPS 0.20, cooling 1.23, lighting 0.02)

2.5 dimensionless PUE ratio (total facility energy / IT equipment energy), 2014 baseline. Not an accuracy score and not a speedup: 1.0 means the facility overhead is nil.

Fields

id
benchmarks/pue-lbnl-2016-us-room-2014-2-5
Metric
dimensionless_ratio
Value
2.5
Unit
dimensionless PUE ratio (total facility energy / IT equipment energy), 2014 baseline. Not an accuracy score and not a speedup: 1.0 means the facility overhead is nil.
Methodology
MODELED BASELINE, TABLE 4 ('2014 PUE by Space Type') of the DOE/BL United States Data Center Energy Usage Report. The row decomposes total PUE into IT (=1 by definition), transformer, UPS, cooling and lighting contributions, and the components sum to the stated total - which is how the table was verified here rather than trusted. Space types are IDC-defined and span both internal enterprise spaces and service-provider spaces; the report states service provider data centers are INCLUSIVE of colocation facilities. This is the most granular public per-facility-type PUE breakdown available from an authoritative US government source. engine_id is ollama only as a schema placeholder: facility metric, no engine.
Measured by
third_party
Reproducible
yes
notes
Room: worse than closet - the room tier has both UPS losses AND substantial cooling losses, topping out at 2.5. The cooling component (1.23) is more than UPS (0.20) and transformer (0.05) combined, which is the general shape of legacy PUE: distribution losses are real but cooling dominates. CAVEAT ON AGE: these are 2014 values and the 2016 report frames the 2020 trajectory separately (dynamic range, consolidation). For a current planning number prefer the 2025 Update's 1.45 national all-equipment average. The 2014 table is retained because the modern public sources publish only fleet or national AVERAGES - this table is the only public breakdown that shows a colocation-class facility is closer to 1.9 than to 1.2. METRIC CORRECTION 2026-10-05 (schema authority pass, agent w5-schema). Value UNCHANGED; `metric` moved quality -> dimensionless_ratio. PUE is a ratio by DEFINITION (total facility energy / IT equipment energy) and carries no faster/slower reading, so it is a dimensionless_ratio rather than a speedup_ratio. It was previously filed as `quality`, the catch-all that gotcha bench-metric-enum-hides-a-dimensionless-ratio names as the reason `quality` cannot be trusted as a semantic filter: that key was spanning accuracy deltas in percentage points, PUE ratios and power ratios simultaneously.

Notes

Room: worse than closet - the room tier has both UPS losses AND substantial cooling losses, topping out at 2.5. The cooling component (1.23) is more than UPS (0.20) and transformer (0.05) combined, which is the general shape of legacy PUE: distribution losses are real but cooling dominates. CAVEAT ON AGE: these are 2014 values and the 2016 report frames the 2020 trajectory separately (dynamic range, consolidation). For a current planning number prefer the 2025 Update's 1.45 national all-equipment average. The 2014 table is retained because the modern public sources publish only fleet or national AVERAGES - this table is the only public breakdown that shows a colocation-class facility is closer to 1.9 than to 1.2.

METRIC CORRECTION 2026-10-05 (schema authority pass, agent w5-schema). Value UNCHANGED; `metric` moved quality -> dimensionless_ratio. PUE is a ratio by DEFINITION (total facility energy / IT equipment energy) and carries no faster/slower reading, so it is a dimensionless_ratio rather than a speedup_ratio. It was previously filed as `quality`, the catch-all that gotcha bench-metric-enum-hides-a-dimensionless-ratio names as the reason `quality` cannot be trusted as a semantic filter: that key was spanning accuracy deltas in percentage points, PUE ratios and power ratios simultaneously.

Cross-references

Engine (1)