NVIDIA GeForce RTX 5070 Family product page (official spec table)

NVIDIA official product page for the RTX 5070. Lists 12GB GDDR7, 672 GB/s memory bandwidth, 250W TGP. Page returned 404 at time of access but specs confirmed via NVIDIA GeForce comparison table and RTX Blackwell architecture whitepaper. | DEAD-LINK CONFIRMED 2026-10-04 - the record's own note already said 'Page returned 404 at time of access'. THREE independent GET probes still return HTTP 404 with title 'Page Not Found | NVIDIA' (365KB shell - a soft-404, the marketing chrome renders around a missing-page title). The parent listing https://www.nvidia.com/en-us/geforce/graphics-cards/50-series/ resolves 200. So the URL was already wrong when the record was written and has not been fixed; the 12GB / 672 GB/s / 250W figures were confirmed through a DIFFERENT NVIDIA page, not this one. status stays draft: an uncited-by-URL figure is not evidence. Three downstream records cite this source for RTX 5070 figures whose actual provenance is the comparison table. | 2026-10-05 REPAIR: REPAIRED - URL REPOINTED TO THE LIVE FAMILY PAGE, AND ONE OF THE THREE CITED FIGURES COULD NOT BE RE-CONFIRMED. The dead single-SKU path .../50-series/rtx-5070/ was replaced by the family page .../50-series/rtx-5070-family/ (HTTP 200). CONTENT VERIFIED from the page's own spec table, column 'GeForce RTX 5070': 12 GB GDDR7 CONFIRMED (Standard Memory Config), 192-bit memory interface, 250 W Total Graphics Power CONFIRMED, plus 6144 CUDA cores, 2.51 GHz boost, 988 AI TOPS, 2-slot 242 mm. NOT FOUND: 672 GB/s memory bandwidth. The family spec table does not publish a memory-bandwidth row at all (it gives config and interface width but not GB/s), so the 672 GB/s figure this record previously carried is NOT substantiated by the page now cited, even though 192-bit GDDR7 at the stated 28 Gbps would produce it. Per the repo rule I am recording the limit rather than quietly keeping the number: 672 GB/s is now DERIVED, not cited, and any record carrying it needs a *_basis field or a different source. status stays draft and confidence stays 0.6 for exactly that reason - two of three figures are first-party-confirmed and the third is not. The parent listing .../50-series/ also still resolves 200. | 2026-10-10 AUDIT: Re-fetched page (HTTP 200). Confirms 12 GB GDDR7, 192-bit memory interface, 250 W TGP, 6144 CUDA cores. Memory bandwidth of 672 GB/s is not explicitly listed in the spec table (derived from 28 Gbps x 192-bit). Confidence kept at 0.6 per repo rule.