Newegg Refreshed (first-party refurbished) Intel Arc B580 12GB tier
Fields
supply/newegg-refreshed-arc-b580Notes
The only first-party refurb channel in this slice that publishes live prices for consumer accelerators, and the contrast with eBay used is the point: refreshed $199.99-$259.99 versus used $290.00-$499.00 versus new $329.99-$590.00. Buying USED Intel silicon is strictly dominated - the refurbished tier is 27% to 34% below new and 31% to 55% below used. That ordering (refurb < used < new) is the opposite of what most people assume, and it holds because used consumer cards here are thin supply with no warranty while the refurb tier is a steady pipeline. AVAILABILITY CAVEAT, important: every refreshed unit in the captured listing was marked OUT OF STOCK. Newegg Refreshed on B580 is a browse-able but rarely actually purchasable tier - treat these as achievable prices, not as items in stock today. This also means availability is recorded as unknown rather than in-stock despite prices showing.
LEAD TIME: null, and deliberately so. A marketplace or big-box reseller publishes STOCK STATE, not a lead time - where this record shows in-stock that means the listing was available on the observation date, and where it shows backorder no week window is published at all. Converting one into the other would be an invention. The one exception in the whole chain is CDW, which does print windows (source spl-cdw-published-lead-times-gpu-2026-10); note that even there the scarcest SKUs - the RTX PRO 6000 96GB cards and DGX Spark - read 'Item Backordered' with NO estimate, so scarcity and lead time are inversely related in what distributors actually publish. Probe log in source spl-negative-no-oem-publishes-lead-time.
EXPORT CONTROL (2026-10-04, mechanism-level; source spl-eccn-3a090-ccl): this is a CONSUMER discrete board (Intel Arc B580 class), which does not meet the ECCN 3A090.a 'total processing performance' >= 4800 or TPP >= 1600 / performance density >= 5.92 thresholds, so it is not an advanced-computing item and the case-by-case / D:5 licence regime does not attach to it; consumer parts of this class generally sit under ECCN 3A001 or are designated EAR99. Recorded FALSE for that reason, NOT because the part is unregulated - it remains under the EAR, subject to destination-country import rules and to screening of the consignee and its ultimate parent against the Entity, Unverified and MEU lists under 15 CFR part 744. This is the case that makes the point sharpest: an Intel Arc B580 and a datacentre accelerator can be sold by the same distributor on the same day under completely different regimes, so export status has to be recorded per part rather than inferred from vendor or channel.