B&H Photo Video Shop Used (refurbished workstation GPU channel)

NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition (OEM), used, B&H, pre-tax, observed 2026-10-03, against $17,499.00 for the same SKU new on the same date. PRICE CLASS: this is an ASKING price captured from a live listing or product page, i.e. the price at which a seller advertises the part for sale right now. It is NOT a sold/completed transaction price, NOT an auction result and NOT a dealer cost. A realised price on the same day would generally be lower, and for used or refurbished parts the gap between ask and realised is typically wide PERISHABLE-FIGURE STAMP (added 2026-10-04, uniform across data/supply/ so it is greppable). PRICE CLASS: ASKING price - the rate at which a seller advertises the item for sale, NOT a sold, completed or realised transaction price. OBSERVED: 2026-10-03 RE-VERIFY BY: 2027-01-04 - the repo's quarterly re-verification bar. After that date this figure is presumed drifted and must be re-checked against its source before it is quoted again. A price without its observation date is noise; this stamp exists so a reader can tell a fresh figure from a stale one without reading prose. UNIT: NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q Workstation Edition (OEM), used, B&H, pre-tax, observed 2026-10-03, against $17,499.00 for the same SKU new on the same date READING RULE: No further perishable flag is published for this figure.

lead_time_weeks is null STRUCTURALLY: this channel publishes STOCK STATE, not a lead time. 'in-stock' means the listing existed on the observation date and 'backorder' carries no week window at all - converting one into the other would invent a number the channel does not state.

EAR 3A001 or EAR99 (below the 3A090.a TPP / performance-density thresholds) + EAR 744.23 (Entity List) + EAR 744.6 (Unverified / MEU lists)

MECHANISM: the part falls BELOW the ECCN 3A090.a/.b TPP and performance-density thresholds, so the advanced-computing licence regime, its case-by-case China/Macau carve-out and its D:5 screening do NOT attach. What remains is the general EAR plus destination-country import rules and screening of the consignee and its ultimate parent against the Entity, Unverified and MEU lists. NO LICENCE REQUIRED for the sale itself; the screening is a party-listing check, not a performance-threshold check. The binding ECCN determination for any specific part is the exporter's own classification, not this record.

Recorded because the discount structure here is the opposite of the used consumer GPU market and that is the actionable finding: the RTX PRO 6000 Max-Q used listing is $16,623.95 against $17,499.00 new, a 5.0% discount, and the RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell is $3,002.95 used against $3,299.99 new, 9.0%. Workstation cards depreciate slowly because they are bought on certification and VRAM, not on price per frame. Contrast with Micro Center, where a refurbished Arc B580 goes for 42% under the new price. If you want the used-market discount on an inference card, buy the consumer part; if you want 96 GB of ECC GDDR7, expect single-digit percentage savings. EXPORT CONTROL (2026-10-04, mechanism-level; source spl-eccn-3a090-ccl): consumer gaming cards of this generation generally do NOT meet the 3A090.a TPP/performance-density parameters and fall under ECCN 3A001 or are designated EAR99, i.e. the advanced-computing licence regime with its case-by-case and D:5 screening does not attach to them. This is exactly what makes export status a PER-PART property rather than a per-vendor one: a GeForce RTX 5090 and a datacenter/professional part from the same vendor and the same process generation can carry entirely different control status. Recorded as false for that reason, NOT because the part is unregulated - it remains subject to the EAR generally, to destination-country import rules, and to screening of the consignee and its ultimate parent against the Entity, Unverified and MEU lists (15 CFR part 744). The binding ECCN determination for any specific SKU is the exporter's own classification, which no public vendor page states. LEAD TIME: null, and deliberately so. A marketplace or big-box reseller publishes STOCK STATE, not a lead time - where this record shows in-stock that means the listing was available on the observation date, and where it shows backorder no week window is published at all. Converting one into the other would be an invention. The one exception in the whole chain is CDW, which does print windows (source spl-cdw-published-lead-times-gpu-2026-10); note that even there the scarcest SKUs - the RTX PRO 6000 96GB cards and DGX Spark - read 'Item Backordered' with NO estimate, so scarcity and lead time are inversely related in what distributors actually publish. Probe log in source spl-negative-no-oem-publishes-lead-time. | PRICE-ATTRIBUTION FIX 2026-10-11 (crawler/w17-dc-capex): accelerator_ids previously listed nvidia-rtx-4080. The price_usd above is the used RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Max-Q price that price_basis NAMES; the 4080 never appears in it. nvidia-rtx-4080 was over-attributed under RULE A of gotcha value-cheapest-usable-vram-and-what-it-actually-runs and has been removed. This record was one of the two sources of the '$16,624 RTX 4080' capex quoted in that gotcha.