inference/research
verifiedhigh · 0.85updated 2026-10-12

B&H Photo Video (US pro photo / video / broadcast retailer)

NVIDIA / PNY / ASUS / GIGABYTE · United States

Fields

id
supply/bh-photo-workstation-gpus
Kind
enterprise-distributor
Vendor
NVIDIA / PNY / ASUS / GIGABYTE
Region
United States
Channels
resellermarketplace
Price (USD)
16,999.99
Price basis
PNY NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition 96GB GDDR7 bare card, B&H, pre-tax, observed 2026-10-03, listed 'Temporarily Out of Stock'. Range across the RTX PRO 6000 family on the same page: $16,499.00 (PNY Workstation) to $17,499.00 (NVIDIA Max-Q Workstation OEM). PRICE CLASS: this is an ASKING price captured from a live listing or product page, i.e. the price at which a seller advertises the part for sale right now. It is NOT a sold/completed transaction price, NOT an auction result and NOT a dealer cost. A realised price on the same day would generally be lower, and for used or refurbished parts the gap between ask and realised is typically wide PERISHABLE-FIGURE STAMP (added 2026-10-04, uniform across data/supply/ so it is greppable). PRICE CLASS: ASKING price captured from a live listing or product page - the price at which a seller advertises the item right now. NOT a sold/completed transaction price, NOT an auction result and NOT a dealer cost; for used or refurbished parts the gap between ask and realised is typically wide. OBSERVED: 2026-10-03 RE-VERIFY BY: 2027-01-04 - the repo's quarterly re-verification bar. After that date this figure is presumed drifted and must be re-checked against its source before it is quoted again. A price without its observation date is noise; this stamp exists so a reader can tell a fresh figure from a stale one without reading prose. UNIT: PNY NVIDIA RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition 96GB GDDR7 bare card, B&H, pre-tax, observed 2026-10-03, listed 'Temporarily Out of Stock' READING RULE: No further perishable flag is published for this figure.
Availability
backorder
Lead time source
published
Lead time basis
NEGATIVE, DELIBERATELY NOT STRUCTURAL: no lead time in weeks is printed for these SKUs. It is not that no vendor in the chain publishes one - CDW does, and it is recorded on cdw-enterprise as 'published' - but this channel routes to 'request a quote' or shows a stock count instead, so the number exists elsewhere in the market and is not surfaced here. Checked 2026-10-04 per source spl-negative-no-oem-publishes-lead-time.
Export controlled
no
Export control regime
EAR 3A001 or EAR99 (below the 3A090.a TPP / performance-density thresholds) + EAR 744.23 (Entity List) + EAR 744.6 (Unverified / MEU lists)
Export control note
MECHANISM: the part falls BELOW the ECCN 3A090.a/.b TPP and performance-density thresholds, so the advanced-computing licence regime, its case-by-case China/Macau carve-out and its D:5 screening do NOT attach. What remains is the general EAR plus destination-country import rules and screening of the consignee and its ultimate parent against the Entity, Unverified and MEU lists. NO LICENCE REQUIRED for the sale itself; the screening is a party-listing check, not a performance-threshold check. The binding ECCN determination for any specific part is the exporter's own classification, not this record.
notes
The clearest US pro-audio/video channel and the only large retailer that carries the RTX PRO 6000 line as discrete cards. Two facts matter for availability planning: (1) every RTX 5090 board on the site was 'Temporarily Out of Stock' on 2026-10-03, and (2) a search for RTX 3090 returns no 3090 SKU at all, so the consumer 3090 channel is closed here. B&H also runs a 'Shop Used' channel: RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell listed at $3,299.99 new against $3,002.95 used, and the RTX PRO 6000 Max-Q at $16,623.95 used against $17,499.00 new - roughly 5-6% off for workstation parts, which is not the 40-60% discount the used consumer market offers. EXPORT CONTROL (2026-10-04, mechanism-level; source spl-eccn-3a090-ccl): consumer gaming cards of this generation generally do NOT meet the 3A090.a TPP/performance-density parameters and fall under ECCN 3A001 or are designated EAR99, i.e. the advanced-computing licence regime with its case-by-case and D:5 screening does not attach to them. This is exactly what makes export status a PER-PART property rather than a per-vendor one: a GeForce RTX 5090 and a datacenter/professional part from the same vendor and the same process generation can carry entirely different control status. Recorded as false for that reason, NOT because the part is unregulated - it remains subject to the EAR generally, to destination-country import rules, and to screening of the consignee and its ultimate parent against the Entity, Unverified and MEU lists (15 CFR part 744). The binding ECCN determination for any specific SKU is the exporter's own classification, which no public vendor page states. LEAD TIME: null, and deliberately so. A marketplace or big-box reseller publishes STOCK STATE, not a lead time - where this record shows in-stock that means the listing was available on the observation date, and where it shows backorder no week window is published at all. Converting one into the other would be an invention. The one exception in the whole chain is CDW, which does print windows (source spl-cdw-published-lead-times-gpu-2026-10); note that even there the scarcest SKUs - the RTX PRO 6000 96GB cards and DGX Spark - read 'Item Backordered' with NO estimate, so scarcity and lead time are inversely related in what distributors actually publish. Probe log in source spl-negative-no-oem-publishes-lead-time. | PRICE-ATTRIBUTION FIX 2026-10-11 (crawler/w17-dc-capex): accelerator_ids previously listed nvidia-rtx-4080 and nvidia-rtx-5070-ti. The price_usd above is the PNY RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition price that price_basis NAMES; neither consumer part appears in it. Both ids were over-attributed under RULE A of gotcha value-cheapest-usable-vram-and-what-it-actually-runs and have been removed. The nvidia-rtx-5090 id is retained only because the record's own notes discuss the 5090 channel; it carries the same RULE-A defect and should be reviewed. | PRICE-ATTRIBUTION FIX 2026-10-12 (repo-hygiene wave, ledger D12 takeover): removed nvidia-rtx-5090 - price_basis names the PNY RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell; the 5090 appears only in notes as an out-of-stock observation, with no price here. Its real cheapest price remains nvidia-marketplace-geforce ($1,999). RULE A of the same gotcha.

Notes

The clearest US pro-audio/video channel and the only large retailer that carries the RTX PRO 6000 line as discrete cards. Two facts matter for availability planning: (1) every RTX 5090 board on the site was 'Temporarily Out of Stock' on 2026-10-03, and (2) a search for RTX 3090 returns no 3090 SKU at all, so the consumer 3090 channel is closed here. B&H also runs a 'Shop Used' channel: RTX PRO 4000 Blackwell listed at $3,299.99 new against $3,002.95 used, and the RTX PRO 6000 Max-Q at $16,623.95 used against $17,499.00 new - roughly 5-6% off for workstation parts, which is not the 40-60% discount the used consumer market offers.

EXPORT CONTROL (2026-10-04, mechanism-level; source spl-eccn-3a090-ccl): consumer gaming cards of this generation generally do NOT meet the 3A090.a TPP/performance-density parameters and fall under ECCN 3A001 or are designated EAR99, i.e. the advanced-computing licence regime with its case-by-case and D:5 screening does not attach to them. This is exactly what makes export status a PER-PART property rather than a per-vendor one: a GeForce RTX 5090 and a datacenter/professional part from the same vendor and the same process generation can carry entirely different control status. Recorded as false for that reason, NOT because the part is unregulated - it remains subject to the EAR generally, to destination-country import rules, and to screening of the consignee and its ultimate parent against the Entity, Unverified and MEU lists (15 CFR part 744). The binding ECCN determination for any specific SKU is the exporter's own classification, which no public vendor page states.

LEAD TIME: null, and deliberately so. A marketplace or big-box reseller publishes STOCK STATE, not a lead time - where this record shows in-stock that means the listing was available on the observation date, and where it shows backorder no week window is published at all. Converting one into the other would be an invention. The one exception in the whole chain is CDW, which does print windows (source spl-cdw-published-lead-times-gpu-2026-10); note that even there the scarcest SKUs - the RTX PRO 6000 96GB cards and DGX Spark - read 'Item Backordered' with NO estimate, so scarcity and lead time are inversely related in what distributors actually publish. Probe log in source spl-negative-no-oem-publishes-lead-time. | PRICE-ATTRIBUTION FIX 2026-10-11 (crawler/w17-dc-capex): accelerator_ids previously listed nvidia-rtx-4080 and nvidia-rtx-5070-ti. The price_usd above is the PNY RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell Workstation Edition price that price_basis NAMES; neither consumer part appears in it. Both ids were over-attributed under RULE A of gotcha value-cheapest-usable-vram-and-what-it-actually-runs and have been removed. The nvidia-rtx-5090 id is retained only because the record's own notes discuss the 5090 channel; it carries the same RULE-A defect and should be reviewed. | PRICE-ATTRIBUTION FIX 2026-10-12 (repo-hygiene wave, ledger D12 takeover): removed nvidia-rtx-5090 - price_basis names the PNY RTX PRO 6000 Blackwell; the 5090 appears only in notes as an out-of-stock observation, with no price here. Its real cheapest price remains nvidia-marketplace-geforce ($1,999). RULE A of the same gotcha.

Cross-references