NVIDIA NVLink 5.0
Fields
interconnect/nvlink-5Notes
Blackwell generation. HEADLINE CAPABILITY, the third required quantity for this generation: NVLink 5 is the first generation to DOUBLE THE PER-LINK RATE, from 25 GB/s per direction on Gen4 to 50 GB/s per direction, while holding the link count at 18 - so unlike Gen3 and Gen4, this generation's gain came from the SerDes rather than from adding links. Per-GPU bidirectional aggregate therefore goes 900 -> 1,800 GB/s and per-direction per-GPU 450 -> 900 GB/s, i.e. a clean 2x across both axes simultaneously. NVIDIA's own comparative framing is a 1.7x claim at the rack level ('the fifth-generation NVLink is 12x faster than the first generation at 160 GB/s', net2-nvidia-nvswitch3-blog, and '1.7x' on the Blackwell side), which is a different quantity again and should not be read as the link-rate step.
Inference consequence: tensor-parallel sharding wants the highest per-direction fabric rate available, because every layer boundary ships activations across the link. The bidirectional aggregate figure that dominates marketing is not what a single collective move sees. For inference this is the generation where tensor parallelism plus expert parallelism inside one NVL72 rack becomes fabric-legal rather than a compromise: 130 TB/s total aggregate per the vendor table. PROVENANCE 2026-10-05: the per-link figure is DERIVED - NVIDIA publishes no per-link rate for this generation, only 1,800 GB/s per GPU and 18 links - so unlike nvlink-1/2/3 it is arithmetic, not transcription. See gotcha w7n-nvlink-per-link-rate-is-derived-not-published-except-gen1, and gotcha w7n-nvlink-per-gpu-aggregate-vs-per-link-rate for the direction axis. Note the vendor table is marked preliminary and subject to change, which is why confidence is 0.9 rather than higher.
Cross-references
This record references no other records — it is a leaf. It is cited by 27.